Almanac
Microsoft/copilotMicrosoft 365

Consultant KB for the whole Microsoft Copilot estate. Spans Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio, the Dynamics 365 Copilots, Power Platform Copilot, Fabric & Power BI Copilot, Copilot in Azure, Windows & consumer Copilot, extensibility & agents, Security Copilot, and GitHub Copilot, plus admin/security and cross-product decision guides. Populated by the daily author agent from Copilot release notes / release plans plus the author's own consultant notes.

feature-copilot-outlook.mdv2 · history
CurrentApplies to M365 CopilotUpdated last weekSource support.microsoft.com

What it does

Copilot in Outlook drafts and rewrites emails, summarises long threads, suggests replies, and can coach your tone before you send. It also surfaces scheduling and follow-up help.

Key facts

  • Summarise collapses a long thread into the key points with links back to the messages.
  • Draft and Coaching work on the compose window — tone, clarity, length.
  • Some Copilot features are tied to the new Outlook and Outlook on the web; classic Outlook lags.
  • It reads only mail the user can already access — no extra reach into other mailboxes.

When to use / skip

Excellent for taming a 40-message thread you've been added to late, and for softening or tightening a draft. Skip the auto-draft for short, routine replies — you'll type them faster than you'll prompt them.

Configuration decisions

  • Which Outlook client your users are on, and whether that supports the features you're promising.
  • Whether Coaching and drafting are surfaced or held back during early rollout.

Gotchas

  • The classic-vs-new Outlook split is the number-one support headache. People on classic don't see what the training showed.
  • Thread summaries can miss nuance in a heated exchange — read the actual mail before you act on a summary.
  • Drafted replies can be over-long and over-polite for internal comms.

Consultant notes

  • Pin down client versions before you train anyone. "It's not there" is nearly always a client issue, not a licensing one.
  • Thread summarisation is the sleeper hit — it's the feature people keep once the novelty of drafting wears off.
  • Tone coaching lands well with people who write a lot of external mail; less so with engineers firing off one-liners.

Worth revisiting after the next release wave.

Was this accurate?