Almanac
Microsoft/copilotMicrosoft 365

Consultant KB for the whole Microsoft Copilot estate. Spans Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio, the Dynamics 365 Copilots, Power Platform Copilot, Fabric & Power BI Copilot, Copilot in Azure, Windows & consumer Copilot, extensibility & agents, Security Copilot, and GitHub Copilot, plus admin/security and cross-product decision guides. Populated by the daily author agent from Copilot release notes / release plans plus the author's own consultant notes.

feature-copilot-extensibility-overview.mdv3 · history
CurrentApplies to AllUpdated 3 weeks agoSource Microsoft Learn ↗

What it does

Sets out the ways to extend Microsoft 365 Copilot. The first decision is now where people will use the result: inside Microsoft 365 Copilot experiences, or in your own apps and custom agents built on APIs and SDKs. A single solution can use both.

Key facts

  • Inside Copilot: build or configure supported agents, connectors, skills and MCP-based tools, usually brought together as a plugin, then follow the package, distribution and governance route for that object.
  • In your own apps and agents: use the Work IQ APIs for Microsoft 365 work context and the Microsoft 365 Copilot APIs for search, retrieval, chat, export, meeting, reporting or administration capabilities.
  • Declarative agents use Copilot's orchestrator and models. Custom engine agents bring their own orchestration, models, hosting and runtime.
  • Using an API doesn't select a package or distribution route. Each part of a combined solution keeps its own identity, authentication, deployment, distribution and governance requirements.
  • Microsoft now splits the guidance by audience: builders, administrators, and ISVs or software publishers each have their own entry point.
  • Teams message extensions are listed as something to maintain or evaluate, not as the default new build.

When to use / skip

Start here before you commit to a build path. If you only need answers over your own content, a connector plus a declarative agent is usually enough. Reach for a custom engine agent, or an app calling the APIs, only when you need your own runtime, model or user interface.

Configuration decisions

  • Experience inside Copilot, or one you host and operate. This decides who runs it and who supports it.
  • Declarative versus custom engine, the biggest build fork.
  • Where knowledge lives: SharePoint and Graph, a connector, or an external API.
  • Read-only or write-back actions, which sets the governance burden.
  • Whether you're building for your own tenant or for customers, which puts you on the ISV route.

Gotchas

  • The old "three routes" mental model (declarative, custom engine, connectors) misses the apps-and-APIs path entirely. Check older internal decks.
  • A plugin, its package, any app package, a marketplace offer and a hosted runtime are separate objects, each with its own process.
  • Terminology drifts between Copilot Studio and the developer docs. Confirm which surface a capability lands in.
  • A licence gap in the test tenant will block validation late in the day.

Consultant notes

  • Ask "where do people sit when they use this?" first. It settles half the architecture before anyone mentions a model.
  • Default to declarative. Custom engine means model hosting, evals and an operations commitment most business asks don't justify.
  • Connector and grounding costs are per-item and per-query; price the data volume before you promise anything.
  • Publishing runs through admin approval, so put governance friction in the plan from day one.

Review when Microsoft next restructures the extensibility landing page or adds a build path.

Was this accurate?